King was dead by this time, and the committee ruled that revoking the title would serve no purpose. It was also discovered that Kings famous I HAVE A DREAM speech was also not his own. He stole it from a sermon by Archibald Carey, a popular black preacher in the 1. King was under FBI surveillance for several years until he died due to his ties with communist organizations throughout the country. King accepted money from the organizations to fund his movements. In return, King had to appoint communist leaders to run certain districts of his SCLC Southern Christian Leadership Conference, who then could project their communist ideas to larger audiences. A federal judge in the 6. FBI files on King links to communism to remain top secret until 2. Senator Jesse Helms appealed to the Supreme Court in 1. Senate to create the Martin Luther King Federal Holiday could be abolished. He was denied. 4. One of Kings closest friends, Rev. Ralph Abernathy, wrote a book in 1. Kings obsession with white prostitutes. King would often use church donations to have drunken sex parties, where he would hire two to three white prostitutes, occasionally beating them brutally. This has also been reported by the FBI agents who monitored King. King was married with four children. Martin Luther King Day. The%20King%202%20Hearts%20OST%20Part%203-800x800.jpg' alt='Be A King 2 ' title='Be A King 2 ' />A day when this country will come to a screeching halt so we can have parades and memorials to honor this man, a man that most of the world views as a saint for his role in the civil rights movement. No other public holiday in the United States honors a single individual. Of all the great leaders in our Nations history none of them have their own holiday. All of our great war heroes share Memorial Day. All of our great presidents share Presidents Day. Yet king a man who was a phony, a cheater, a traitor, and a sexual degenerate gets a day of his own. MOSTLY FALSERATINGORIGINEvery January, as the federal holiday commemorating the birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. King is the title given to a male monarch in a variety of contexts. The female equivalent is queen regnant while the title of queen on its own usually refers to the. Be A King 2 ' title='Be A King 2 ' />Unfortunately, most of the information it presents is false and thereby misleadingly denigrates the memory of a man whom the U. S. has chosen to honor. To this day, questions remain over the names of both Martin Luther King, Jr. Best Asian pussy in free Asian porn movies with quality babes from hot Asian girl to dirty Asian teen and much more 2 Kings 2 New International Version NIV Elijah Taken Up to Heaven. When the Lord was about to take Elijah up to heaven in a whirlwind, Elijah and Elisha were on. King Shocks is a manufacturer and servicer of custom made adjustable and rebuildable automotive shock absorbers and performance racing products for utility vehicles. According to an account Martin Luther King, Sr. New York Post reporter in 1. Martin Luther, and the appearance of the name Michael in his sons birth records was a mistake due to confusion over his own name. I had been known as Michael Luther King or Mike up until I was 2. James Albert King, told me You arent named Mike or Michael either. Your name is Martin Luther King. Your mother just called you Mike for short. I was elated to know that I had really been named for the great leader of the Protestant Reformation, but there was no way of knowing if papa had made a mistake after all. Neither of my parents could read or write and they kept no record of Negro births in our backwoods county I gladly accepted Martin Luther King as my real name and when my son M. L. was born, I proudly named him Martin Luther King, Jr. Installing And Configuring Fedora Xen Virtualization Virtual Machine. But it was not until 1. I was seeking my first passport that I found out that Dr. Johnson, who delivered M. L., had listed him in the city records as Michael Luther King, Jr., because he thought that was my real name. No records documenting a formal name change for either King yet have been uncovered, so in a strict legal sense one might say that Martin Luther King, Jr. Michael until his death. However, what constitutes a legal name can be quite fluid. My own mother, born in the same era as Martin Luther King, Jr., was raised by people other than her birth parents from an early age and did not know her real first and middle names. Indeed, she did not learn which names were actually listed on her birth record until I obtained a copy of the document for her when she was in her mid 5. Nonetheless, the first and middle names she adopted in place of the unknown real ones were listed on every government issued record pertaining to her created during her adult lifetime e. Social Security card, childrens birth certificates and were therefore her legal names every bit as much, if not moreso, than the ones that appeared on her birth record. In any case, whether Martin Luther King, Sr. Martin by their fathers but called Michael through confusion or mistake or simply decided in his adulthood that he preferred he and his son be known as Martin instead of Michael, the name change was not, as suggested above, an affectation on the part of Martin Luther King, Jr. This is the one claim presented here that has some element of truth to it. During the 1. 98. The Martin Luther King Papers Project uncovered evidence that the dissertation King prepared for his Ph. D. in theology from Boston University, A Comparison of the Conception of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Henry Nelson Wieman, was plagiarized, and the story broke in the national media in 1. King included in his dissertation a good deal of material taken verbatim from a variety of other sources without proper attribution or any attribution at all, an act which constitutes plagiarism by ordinary academic standards. The Martin Luther King Papers Project addressed the issue in Volume II of The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. FAQ on their web site. The readers of Kings dissertation, L. Harold De. Wolf and S. Paul Schilling, a professor of systematic theology who had recently arrived at Boston University, failed to notice Kings problematic use of sources. After reading a draft of the dissertation, De. Wolf criticized him for failing to make explicit presuppositions and norms employed in the critical evaluation, but his comments were largely positive. He commended King for his handling of a difficult topic with broad learning, impressive ability and convincing mastery of the works immediately involved. Schilling found two problems with Kings citation practices while reading the draft, but dismissed these as anomalous and praised the dissertation in his Second Readers report As was true of Kings other academic papers, the plagiaries in his dissertation escaped detection in his lifetime. His professors at Boston, like those at Crozer, saw King as an earnest and even gifted student who presented consistent, though evolving, theological identity in his essays, exams and classroom comments Although the extent of Kings plagiaries suggest he knew that he was at least skirting academic norms, the extant documents offer no direct evidence in this matter. Thus he may have simply become convinced, on the basis of his grades at Crozer and Boston, that his papers were sufficiently competent to withstand critical scrutiny.