By Robert Parry. It seems that The New York Times cant let a good lie lie. Even after being pushed into running an embarrassing correction retracting its false claim that there was a consensus of all 1. U. S. intelligence agencies that Russia hacked Democratic emails and made them public to help Donald Trump defeat Hillary Clinton, the Times is back suggesting exactly that. New York Times building in New York City. Photo from WikipediaThe Times current ploy is to say the Russian hacking claims are the consensus judgment of the U. S. intelligence community without citing a specific number of agencies. For instance, on Friday, the Times published an article by Matt Flegenheimer about the U. S. Senate vote to prevent President Trump from lifting sanctions on Russia and deployed the misleading phrasing The Trump administration has opposed the sanctions against Russia, arguing that it needs flexibility to pursue a more collaborative diplomacy with a country that, by American intelligence consensus, interfered in last years presidential election. So, instead of explaining the truth that the Jan. Intelligence Community Assessment was the work of a small group of hand picked analysts from three of the agencies under the watchful eye of then CIA Director John Brennan and beneath the oversight of then Director of National Intelligence James Clapper the Times opts to give its readers the misleading impression that there was a consensus within the U. S. intelligence community. In other words, unless a Times reader knows the truth by having read it at a non mainstream media outlet such as Consortiumnews. Russia gate affair. Marginalizing Dissent. And the continuation of this willful deception comes as the Times and other mainstream media outlets make progress in their plans to deploy Internet algorithms to hunt down and marginalize what they deem fake news, including articles that challenge the mainstream medias power to control the dominant news narrative. A report by the World Socialist Web Site found that in the three months since Internet monopoly Google announced plans to keep users from accessing fake news, the global traffic rankings of a broad range of left wing, progressive, anti war and democratic rights organizations have fallen significantly. Googles strategy is to downgrade search results for targeted Web sites based on a supposed desire to limit reader access to low quality information, but the targets reportedly include some of the highest quality alternative news sites on the Internet, such as according to the report Consortiumnews. Google sponsors the First Draft Coalition, which was created to counter alleged fake news and consists of mainstream news outlets, including the Times and The Washington Post, as well as establishment approved Web sites, such as Bellingcat, which has a close association with the anti Russia and pro NATO Atlantic Council. This creation of a modern day Ministry of Truth occurred under the cover of a mainstream driven hysteria about fake news and Russian propaganda in the wake of Donald Trumps election. Last Thanksgiving Day, the Post ran a front page article citing accusations from an anonymous Web site, Prop. Or. Not, that identified 2. Web sites including such Internet stalwarts as Truthdig, Counterpunch and Consortiumnews as purveyors of Russian propaganda. Apparently, Prop. Or. Nots standard was to smear any news outlet that questioned the State Departments Official Narrative on the Ukraine crisis or some other global hot spot, but the Post didnt offer any actual specifics of what these Web sites had done to earn their place on a Mc. Carthyistic blacklist. An Orwellian Future. In early May 2. 01. Times chimed in with a laudatory article about how sophisticated algorithms could purge the Internet of alleged fake news or what the mainstream media deems to be misinformation. Big Brother poster illustrating George Orwells novel about modern propaganda, 1. As I wrote at the time, you dont need a huge amount of imagination to see how this combination of mainstream groupthink and artificial intelligence could create an Orwellian future in which only one side of a story gets told and the other side simply disappears from view. After my article appeared, I received a call from an NPR reporter who was planning a segment on this new technology and argued with me about my concerns. However, after I offered a detailed explanation about how I saw this as a classic case of the cure being far worse than the disease, I was not invited onto the NPR program. Also, as for the relatively small number of willfully produced fake news stories, none appear to have traced back to Russia despite extensive efforts by the mainstream U. S. media to make the connection. When the U. S. mainstream media has tracked down a source of fake news, it has turned out to be some young entrepreneur trying to make some money by getting lots of clicks. For instance, on Nov. Russia hysteria was heating up in the weeks following Trumps election, the Times ran a relatively responsible article revealing how a leading fake news Web site was not connected to Russia at all but rather was a profit making effort by an unemployed Georgian student who was using a Web site in Tbilisi to make money by promoting pro Trump stories. The owner of the Web site, 2. Beqa Latsabidse, said he had initially tried to push stories favorable to Hillary Clinton but that proved unprofitable so he switched to publishing anti Clinton and pro Trump articles whether true or not. While creators of intentionally fake news and baseless conspiracy theories deserve wholehearted condemnation, the idea of giving the Times and a collection of Google approved news outlets the power to prevent public access to information that challenges equally mindless groupthinks is a chilling and dangerous prospect. Russia gate Doubts. Even if the Russian government did hack the Democratic emails and slip them to Wiki. Leaks a charge that both the Kremlin and Wiki. Leaks deny there is no claim that those emails were fake. Indeed, all evidence is that they were actual emails and newsworthy to boot. Couple walking along the Kremlin, Dec. Photo by Robert ParryMeanwhile, U. S. government accusations against the Russian network, RT, have related more to it covering topics that may make the Establishment look bad such as the Occupy Wall Street protests, fracking for natural gas, and the opinions of third party presidential candidates than publishing false stories. The Secret Of Monkey Island Download Deutsch Kostenlos Pc on this page. In some cases, State Department officials have even made their own false allegations in attacking RT. The current Russia gate frenzy is a particularly scary example of how dubious government conclusions and mainstream media falsehoods can propel the world toward nuclear destruction. The mainstream medias certainty about Russias guilt in the disclosure of Democratic emails is a case in point even when many well informed experts have expressed serious doubts though almost always at alternative media sites. See, for instance, former WMD inspector Scott Ritters warning about lessons unlearned from the Iraq debacle or the opinions of U.